Are Cheap AI Tracks Killing Our Scene?

Shivace

New Member
May 4, 2025
13 Posts
37 Thanked
I don’t want to start this thread in the “Upcoming Trance & Prog Release” section. It would be a desecration of everything else posted there.

Twenty years ago, Armind released Arksun’s “Arisen”. There’s a widely repeated story (though I’ve never found the original source) that Armin van Buuren once said: “This is exactly the reason Armada was founded — to put out records like this.”
Twenty years later, we now have a release like this: a track that’s almost entirely AI‑generated — not even convincingly human‑like AI, but something with utterly cheap presets, rough mixing and a dreadful arrangement. And it came out on Armind, part of Armada Music.

I want to talk about this “track” that was released on Armind a few days ago: Frank Spector – “Voulez Vous.”


It was played on ASOT, praised by Armin, even picked as the TOTW once. But once the full track was out, anyone with ears who has used Suno or similar AI music tools could instantly tell this is AI‑generated: piercing synths, nonsensical drops, and a six‑bar outro — all problems you constantly run into when trying to generate progressive or melodic techno with Suno. Many of my friends are furious.

Plus, we found another similar release on Suanda: Bigtopo & JARR Head – “Ten Minutes of Life”, though it sounds less awful.


Maybe we should have seen it coming. Over the last two decades, trance went from mainstream to marginalised, then got pulled back by the retro wave. Armind, and Armada itself, went from a golden‑standard trance label to just another international trance label, and then to just another big EDM label. As early as when the ASOT 2026 Anthem used AI vocals — or even before that, when Suno first appeared — I pessimistically thought FSOE would be the first major trance label to be replaced by AI, and that the formulaic uplifting and full‑on psy we knew would be the first trance styles to fall.

Twenty years ago, the only “flaw” people could find in Arisen was that it was so good it seemed impossible for a human to make. Now, the only “flaw” in a piece of garbage like Voulez Vous is that it’s so bad it clearly wasn’t made by a human.
To be fair, Frank Spector made decent tracks four years ago — “La Nuit (Frank Spector Mix)” was discussed on our forum. How ironic.

I acknowledge that AI will eventually replace humans on a large scale, and I’m happy to enjoy what AI can bring to entertainment. But the generated creations that replace human work cannot be AI productions of this quality. It’s just so terrible that I can’t imagine how bad his prompts have been. And what’s most disturbing isn’t just how bad the AI is, it’s that Armind’s A&R looked at this level of work and thought it was good enough.
 
Last edited:

Archon

Gagi
TranceFix Crew
Jun 27, 2020
4,322 Posts
3,258 Thanked
Nice text but:
1. "ruining" is a big word
2. regardless of whether (some) tracks on Armada are AI or human generated, Armada has certainly been on a downfall, (trance) music-quality wise, over the past decade or so

So I don't think it's certainly something to do with AI, although it definitely doesn't help. Just listen to music you like and discard the garbage. It certainly won't be present much more if not listened to. And if it does, maybe (some) people like it, so I guess no harm then?
 

Shivace

New Member
May 4, 2025
13 Posts
37 Thanked
Nice text but:
1. "ruining" is a big word
2. regardless of whether (some) tracks on Armada are AI or human generated, Armada has certainly been on a downfall, (trance) music-quality wise, over the past decade or so

So I don't think it's certainly something to do with AI, although it definitely doesn't help. Just listen to music you like and discard the garbage. It certainly won't be present much more if not listened to. And if it does, maybe (some) people like it, so I guess no harm then?
Since I’m not a native English speaker, my grasp of some word meanings isn’t perfect, so I apologize in advance.

I don’t think AI at its current level can get signed to any major global label, especially the long-established Armind, even though it has been on a decline for many years. That’s why my friends and I feel disgusted by what they’ve done. Allowing AI garbage of this quality into the market is simply irresponsible toward music.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Ocean Ye

Jetflag

Legendary Member
Jul 17, 2020
4,585 Posts
3,971 Thanked
Ai is very good at two things:

-dumb labour (like easy code writing)
-generic/ “average of all shlop” work

It generates music by drawing from an existing library. Feed it nothing but mona Lisa’s? It will get very good at making Mona Lisa’s. Feed it crap my 3 year old draws and Mona Lisa’s? It will generate an average between those.

Ergo: for AI to make “quality”. It needs to be fed quality.

hence: no. I do not think ai will replace human (quality) art any time soon. In fact. It needs it as a niche, comparative tool at the very least.
 

Ocean Ye

Member
Feb 8, 2026
33 Posts
32 Thanked
A recent report from one of the Chinese AI summits "Xinzhiyuan" says: an AI researcher, a second-year Cambridge mathematics undergraduate, and other experts made a breakthrough by drawing ideas from ChatGPT‘s’ "idea pool" and integrating its best ideas, solving Erdős problem #1196 — a problem that a Cambridge mathematics professor had been unable to solve for seven years. I believe that AI currently does not yet possess independent higher-order thinking ability, and therefore is naturally incapable of undertaking advanced artistic and technical work independently. Maybe it is more akin to a retrieval tool.:alien:
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: Shivace

TRANCEBLASTER

Elite Member
Jul 21, 2020
1,806 Posts
2,563 Thanked
ever since 'Trance' took a massive detour about 20 years ago by abandoning regular vinyl releases, labels have stopped taking risks, knowing they can now release almost anything without financial loss. I have never understood their logic: if a label couldn't sell 200 vinyl copies, why did they think they were heading in the right direction? this remains the biggest mystery to me. if it’s not selling, shouldn't that be a signal to innovate?

'Techno' and 'House' handled this transition perfectly, which is why they remain relevant, commercially successful, and dominant in most clubs.

ultimately, no one will ever bother digging through the back catalogues of these digital giant labels like 'Armada'. there is simply no time for it, and frankly, the music isn't worth the effort. these labels don’t care whether they are releasing AI-generated tracks or the thousandth copy of some soulless uplifting. that’s just my take.
 

Jetflag

Legendary Member
Jul 17, 2020
4,585 Posts
3,971 Thanked
if it’s not selling, shouldn't that be a signal to innovate
They/ It tried 🤷‍♂️ ...which is how you endup with the likes of Trouse or Hardstyle.

Innovating sounds nice and utopian but it is, in virtually any (financial) context, risk ridden.
with either being not profitable soon enough if done too peevisly/ carefull, or disasterous on (too) quick implementation outright.

innovating does not mean being auto default succesfull with what you (try to) innovate by a long shot..

this is precisely why big companies for instance are so slow and hesitant in doing so by the way..
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Shivace

afterhourpower

Senior Member
Aug 26, 2023
465 Posts
389 Thanked
The trance scene is pretty dead already unfortunately. AI tracks flooding the scene will make it even harder to find great music.

I suspect one of my favorite newer artists, Yerbby, also uses AI in some form. But I still like the tracks. So yeah, should I abandon listening to it or enjoy it?
 

Pokkryshkin

Senior Member
May 7, 2022
739 Posts
539 Thanked
The trance scene is pretty dead already unfortunately. AI tracks flooding the scene will make it even harder to find great music.

I suspect one of my favorite newer artists, Yerbby, also uses AI in some form. But I still like the tracks. So yeah, should I abandon listening to it or enjoy it?
If he uses it and his music still sounds interesting, then why not? I don’t care at all whether a person makes music or an AI algorithm does. If it resonates with me in some way, then why not? Even if you don’t use AI, you can still get some inspiring ideas when you lack inspiration just by messing around and generating something. Often, when I listen to some generated snippet, I hear a continuation in my head I just don’t have the skills to bring it to life.
 

Progrez

Legendary Member
Jun 17, 2022
3,931 Posts
2,272 Thanked
The trance scene has been shit for a long time, even before AI appeared. I think it ended around 2006
This and 2006 wasn't a bad year we can all blame the GFC for it that changed everything which happened in September 2008. I don't want to repeat myself either we''ve had this discussion before. Yes, there were some horrible tracks by Rank 1 and Chocolate Puma and Bart Claassen back in 2006.

There's really not that much AI tracks yet appearing yet, is there?
Ferry Corsten used Suno for one of his tracks and one of the artists used AI as well for his track and he got the track signed up on Coldharbour recordings.

 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Pokkryshkin

erickUO

Elite Member
Jul 13, 2020
1,405 Posts
1,763 Thanked
If AI is an averaging machine, sooner or later, the tracks won’t pass copyright or AI detection because they will sound too similar.
Anyway, the owner of Morphosis Recordings even complained about artists using the same samples which make them unable to monetize.

Screenshot 2026-05-09 at 10.01.58.jpg
 

Progrez

Legendary Member
Jun 17, 2022
3,931 Posts
2,272 Thanked
It was finisher. Real problem was overabundance of amateur producers.
I don't know many some of the so called 'professional producers' were and are still producing quite amateurish and mediocre tracks as well. Both sides of extremes on both sides one side was no journey just soulless farty trouse/edm shit shouting vocals and loud and no journey uplifting trance. Armin, Markus Schulz and Mike Push being one of them. The AI stuff sounds better than what they are making and I posted them just to take a piss at them.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: Homer S