Classic Trance Historical Breakdown [1987-2007]

Hensmon

Admin
TranceFix Crew
Jun 27, 2020
3,740 Posts
3,427 Thanked
UK
As much as I love As The Rush Comes, I think it's not a stretch to call it cheesy @JohnnyBarefoot1992, especially in contrast to what was being made just a few years before. Today we've gone so far into cheese/genericism that looking back on that track and other similar ones and they feel a lot more palatable and serious in comparison. So I guess what I'm saying is it depends on which direction you go in time.

Nice write up tho @TheTranceHistorian, enjoyed reading it. It does feel a little bias, but at the same time its more fun and thought-provoking to read opinionated pieces sometimes, versus those that skirt around the topic in a general and safe way, with nothing strong to say.
 
Aug 23, 2022
220 Posts
195 Thanked
As much as I love As The Rush Comes, I think it's not a stretch to call it cheesy @JohnnyBarefoot1992, especially in contrast to what was being made just a few years before. Today we've gone so far into cheese/genericism that looking back on that track and other similar ones and they feel a lot more palatable and serious in comparison.

A sentiment I can wholeheartedly agree with (nostalgia is a powerful drug, we shouldn't let it consume us).

As the Rush Comes (specifically the popular Gabriel & Dresden Sweeping Strings Remix) diverges from the ethos of trance music on several key points. Rather than complementing the melodic and emotional layers of the track as an additional texture — much like a classical instrument might — the vocal part often dominates the entire sonic experience in a narcissistic way. During these moments, the background atmosphere and melodic elements nearly disappear altogether.

The track places an excessive emphasis on the low end and bass frequencies in an attempt to grab attention in a somewhat sensationalist fashion, seemingly to mask the fact that very little is happening in the mid and high ranges — where melodic layering and progression should typically occur. These are the very elements that give a piece emotional arc, atmosphere, and hypnotic depth, ultimately guiding the listener toward catharsis and euphoria.

Moreover, the track encounters numerous tempo-related issues — at times due to a lack of proper buildup, and at other times because it abruptly breaks its own momentum to make room for the vocals again. The vocal delivery itself feels strained and artificially emotive, as if trying to force an emotional response rather than allowing one to arise organically.

In trance, such emotional resonance should ideally be evoked through a combination of synthesizer lines, atmospheric pads, and various layered elements — offering an open canvas on which the listeners can project their own feelings and interpretations. The vocals should, at most, hint at meaning, not force-feed the emotional experience.

That said, the track can be enjoyable on its own terms outside of a trance context — but that, in itself, highlights its problematic influence within the genre. It's perfectly valid to enjoy it, but one should also be aware of its musically detrimental impact. And finally: production quality is almost irrelevant. I would choose a poorly mastered track with soul, emotional power, and a strong identity over a pristine-sounding but emotionally hollow one — a thousand times out of a thousand.
 

Hensmon

Admin
TranceFix Crew
Jun 27, 2020
3,740 Posts
3,427 Thanked
UK
As the Rush Comes (specifically the popular Gabriel & Dresden Sweeping Strings Remix) diverges from the ethos of trance music on several key points.

Divergence and the ways you describe it seems off to me. Think of the original rock and roll in the 60s and 70s, and then what came in the 90s and early 2000's. Nirvana, Soundgarden and the Grunge sound has its own identity. It's still rock music, in ethos, character or however you want to call it. Same for Metal music, same for Trance music and its evolution over the years. There's no 'one way' that is defined in stone over a handful of years at the genres inception. 2002 trance might be even more 'trance' than 1992 in ways.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Pokkryshkin

thisispaulmac

New Member
Jan 21, 2024
19 Posts
37 Thanked
Really interesting write up. I have done a couple of similar write ups myself on Reddit myself to go with the Evolution of Trance mix series I created. Have a read here:-

The Completion Evolution of Trance mix series -
The 10 most influential names in the evolution of trance -
As others have mentioned I wouldn't put Goa Trance as a separate thing. It was hugely influential in the mid 90s when Paul Oakenfold was the biggest DJ in the world. The seminal Goa Mix mixed the Goa sound with regular trance and turned lots of people onto the trance sound. Oakey was including loads of Goa trance in his mixes at that point.
 
Aug 23, 2022
220 Posts
195 Thanked
Really interesting write up. I have done a couple of similar write ups myself on Reddit myself to go with the Evolution of Trance mix series I created. Have a read here:-

The Completion Evolution of Trance mix series -
The 10 most influential names in the evolution of trance -
As others have mentioned I wouldn't put Goa Trance as a separate thing. It was hugely influential in the mid 90s when Paul Oakenfold was the biggest DJ in the world. The seminal Goa Mix mixed the Goa sound with regular trance and turned lots of people onto the trance sound. Oakey was including loads of Goa trance in his mixes at that point.
Hey, I've read many of your write-ups already — they’re amazing! They've been a huge help in deepening my understanding of the genre’s development. :)
 

Anderanao

Member
Oct 26, 2023
68 Posts
50 Thanked
I always like the trance history topics but you should be cautious about presenting subjective interpretations as fact.

Your comments on As The Rush Comes comes across as an attempt to post-rationalize and over analyze the track in order to find justification as to why you don’t like it, whilst framing it in the context of an objective reality.

Looking at frequency ranges and then claiming it must have more or less of certain ones to be emotional or atmospheric is very strange way to look at music, and most importantly, it’s not true. Thousands, if not tens of thousands of people, including myself, like the trance atmosphere of the track, and find emotion from it.

“but one should also be aware of its [As The Rush Comes] musically detrimental impact.”

I don’t understand what this means? I think you might be missing the forest for the trees. Music is the sum of It’s parts, and breaking it down mechanically into individual pieces misses the point.

Food for thought, but no objective criteria has successfully been established to completely judge music, so be careful at believing your own narrow idea and conclusions are the ‘right’ one.

Don’t take this the wrong way please, because your posts are still very interesting and I am first in line to buy your book when it is made.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JohnnyBarefoot1992
Aug 23, 2022
220 Posts
195 Thanked
Your comments on As The Rush Comes comes across as an attempt to post-rationalize and over analyze the track in order to find justification as to why you don’t like it, whilst framing it in the context of an objective reality.

Don’t take this the wrong way please, because your posts are still very interesting and I am first in line to buy your book when it is made.

But... I like it though. I just also believe that just because I like it, it doesn't make it immune to criticism (and it doesn't make its problems and negative effects on the genre nonexistent).

I also understand that my critique may have been harsh. I could probably have articulated my thoughts better, but I wrote that comment fairly quickly.

I don't. Constructive criticism is always welcome. :)
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: juracid

TRANCEBLASTER

Elite Member
Jul 21, 2020
1,512 Posts
2,067 Thanked
I think that you should mention 'Robert Miles' in the '1996–1998 – the years of transformations' because it was absolutely significant that the success of 'Children' influenced and changed the sound of 'Trance' music forever. the major labels like 'Universal', 'Sony' or 'EMI' started financially supporting newcomer 'Trance' artists with videos and radio rotations, because they searched for the next ''Children'' tune, they also created many successful CD compilations only to highly support their own catalogues
 
Last edited:

Propeller

Senior Member
Jul 20, 2020
737 Posts
498 Thanked
UK
I completely disagree that tracks like As The Rush Comes or Beautiful Things are "cheesy" and/or "commercial", while both tracks have a strong focus on their vocals, I think both tracks have tremendous productions and have in general aged quite well, probably even more so than most Epic Trance released from '98 up to '01.
Oh come on. I respect your opinion but one of the lines is There's a coldness in the air, yeah but I don't care. The entire vocal is sung with such an attitude that's usually reserved for pop records. It's trying so hard to sound 'cool'. Combined, the content of the lyrics and the attitude make it an unbearable record for me. The underlying instrumental is not horrendous but it is flat and I agree with most of trance Historian's detailed critique of it.
Beautiful things is just a straight up pop vocal though the instrumental is decent.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: TheTranceHistorian

juracid

Member
Sep 26, 2023
107 Posts
87 Thanked
I fully understand the problem with the vocals in Motorcycle or Andain. Back in 2003/2004, my younger self drew much emotion from these tracks, because they fit together and it was just the way 'trance' develops. Because back then, all big trance djs played these vocal Songs frequently in their sets and we were loyal followers since the Commercial Tiesto/Armin/Ferry/Dyk Explosion in 1999/2000. Hell, even once non vocal trance songs got a vocal version during these times with later 'proper' release (for e.g. 'Synaesthesia') So yes, it has felt normal and 'organic' at the same time and many follower - me included - did not question it. (God save the dub.)

But today the view is completely different. The edm people still love the Pop appeal and cheesy vocals, also because they never wanted trance music in the first place. They love just simple modern dance music (which we called 'trouse' already in the second half of the 2000s btw.), the trancer do not.

So for the conclusion: in 2003 it was considered as trance because of the 'normal' development, today it is considered as Pop. So if you make a trance list in 2025, you should NOT include Motorcycle or Andain. Even not Tiesto Silence Remix. Its clearly Pop as well as cheese from todays trance eye. Just my 50 cents.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: TheTranceHistorian
Jul 20, 2020
97 Posts
74 Thanked
Portugal
As much as I love As The Rush Comes, I think it's not a stretch to call it cheesy @JohnnyBarefoot1992, especially in contrast to what was being made just a few years before. Today we've gone so far into cheese/genericism that looking back on that track and other similar ones and they feel a lot more palatable and serious in comparison. So I guess what I'm saying is it depends on which direction you go in time.

Nice write up tho @TheTranceHistorian, enjoyed reading it. It does feel a little bias, but at the same time its more fun and thought-provoking to read opinionated pieces sometimes, versus those that skirt around the topic in a general and safe way, with nothing strong to say.
One could say it might be a bit poppier and more commercial-accessible than other tracks released at that time, but I never really saw it as cheesy, even to this date I still consider it a tremendous tune and I personally think it has aged quite well, I could still listen to it these days and it would probably not feel too far off, if you understand what I'm saying.

A sentiment I can wholeheartedly agree with (nostalgia is a powerful drug, we shouldn't let it consume us).

As the Rush Comes (specifically the popular Gabriel & Dresden Sweeping Strings Remix) diverges from the ethos of trance music on several key points. Rather than complementing the melodic and emotional layers of the track as an additional texture — much like a classical instrument might — the vocal part often dominates the entire sonic experience in a narcissistic way. During these moments, the background atmosphere and melodic elements nearly disappear altogether.

The track places an excessive emphasis on the low end and bass frequencies in an attempt to grab attention in a somewhat sensationalist fashion, seemingly to mask the fact that very little is happening in the mid and high ranges — where melodic layering and progression should typically occur. These are the very elements that give a piece emotional arc, atmosphere, and hypnotic depth, ultimately guiding the listener toward catharsis and euphoria.

Moreover, the track encounters numerous tempo-related issues — at times due to a lack of proper buildup, and at other times because it abruptly breaks its own momentum to make room for the vocals again. The vocal delivery itself feels strained and artificially emotive, as if trying to force an emotional response rather than allowing one to arise organically.

In trance, such emotional resonance should ideally be evoked through a combination of synthesizer lines, atmospheric pads, and various layered elements — offering an open canvas on which the listeners can project their own feelings and interpretations. The vocals should, at most, hint at meaning, not force-feed the emotional experience.

That said, the track can be enjoyable on its own terms outside of a trance context — but that, in itself, highlights its problematic influence within the genre. It's perfectly valid to enjoy it, but one should also be aware of its musically detrimental impact. And finally: production quality is almost irrelevant. I would choose a poorly mastered track with soul, emotional power, and a strong identity over a pristine-sounding but emotionally hollow one — a thousand times out of a thousand.
It is, and I can understand what you mean. But I really don't think that's such a thing regarding ATRC. I think the track is simple, indeed, it doesn't have a whole lot of changes throughout it, but, for the most part, I think the track grows organically, the vocals are well put there, and even if very vocal-driven I don't think it consumes the track that much to actually ruin the experience, I think, for the most part, it is a nice example of a pretty well-done Post-Progressive Vocal Trance tune, I mean, comparing with a lot of pretty bad stuff that has come out especially from the late 2000's to nowadays that track is a masterpiece, I mean, it has aged far better than Gareth Emery's "Concrete Angel" which was released in 2012 and it hasn't aged that well, if you ask me.
 
Jul 20, 2020
97 Posts
74 Thanked
Portugal
Divergence and the ways you describe it seems off to me. Think of the original rock and roll in the 60s and 70s, and then what came in the 90s and early 2000's. Nirvana, Soundgarden and the Grunge sound has its own identity. It's still rock music, in ethos, character or however you want to call it. Same for Metal music, same for Trance music and its evolution over the years. There's no 'one way' that is defined in stone over a handful of years at the genres inception. 2002 trance might be even more 'trance' than 1992 in ways.
It depends on the kind of Trance we're talking about.
Oh come on. I respect your opinion but one of the lines is There's a coldness in the air, yeah but I don't care. The entire vocal is sung with such an attitude that's usually reserved for pop records. It's trying so hard to sound 'cool'. Combined, the content of the lyrics and the attitude make it an unbearable record for me. The underlying instrumental is not horrendous but it is flat and I agree with most of trance Historian's detailed critique of it.
Beautiful things is just a straight up pop vocal though the instrumental is decent.
Once again, I'm not seeing that, I think everything is pretty much well-adjusted there.
Beautiful Things is tremendous! One of my all-time favourite Post-Progressive Vocal Trance tunes!
 
Jul 20, 2020
97 Posts
74 Thanked
Portugal
I fully understand the problem with the vocals in Motorcycle or Andain. Back in 2003/2004, my younger self drew much emotion from these tracks, because they fit together and it was just the way 'trance' develops. Because back then, all big trance djs played these vocal Songs frequently in their sets and we were loyal followers since the Commercial Tiesto/Armin/Ferry/Dyk Explosion in 1999/2000. Hell, even once non vocal trance songs got a vocal version during these times with later 'proper' release (for e.g. 'Synaesthesia') So yes, it has felt normal and 'organic' at the same time and many follower - me included - did not question it. (God save the dub.)

But today the view is completely different. The edm people still love the Pop appeal and cheesy vocals, also because they never wanted trance music in the first place. They love just simple modern dance music (which we called 'trouse' already in the second half of the 2000s btw.), the trancer do not.

So for the conclusion: in 2003 it was considered as trance because of the 'normal' development, today it is considered as Pop. So if you make a trance list in 2025, you should NOT include Motorcycle or Andain. Even not Tiesto Silence Remix. Its clearly Pop as well as cheese from todays trance eye. Just my 50 cents.
Look, if we're really going to do that, then probably most post-1998 Trance stuff, especially the more Epic-Euro-Euphoric and Vocal Trance stuff would probably go out because people were already complaining about the so-called "Watered down McTrance" since those times, I mean, Ferry was considered by some people the one who "killed Trance", so, are we really going to reach the point in which we retrospectively consider ATRC and Beautiful Things as "pop"? And what about Ian van Dahl, Lasgo, DJ Sammy, Milk Inc. and all that stuff? What are we going to consider? The poppiest of pop? I mean, give me a break. If we're really going to retrospectively call certain more commercially-accessible forms of Trance as pop then what would we have left? Probably the more underground stuff by Oliver Lieb, Oliver Prime, Hiver & Hammer and probably the more Progressive and Tech sounds of the time but even those sounds kind of lived through a more commercial zeitgeist of the genre. Oliver Lieb and Humate remixed DJ Sammy, for example, Push remixed Ian Van Dahl twice, you see what I mean with this? Trance, for the most part, has become more or less mainstream since the late 90's and even if nowadays the genre is pretty far from its peak of popularity in the late 90's and early 00's you can't really say it's not a more or less mainstream sound, especially considering that people like Armin, Above & Beyond, Ferry Corsten and a few others still have a considerable following as of these days. Now, of course, you can argue that most of the stuff they play might not be "proper Trance" but in the eyes of the vast majority of people they are still considered Trance DJ's even if we disagree with their service regarding Trance music.

All this to say that it is incredibly dangerous to retrospectively call something that used to be and still is widely accepted as Trance as something else because if we do that we might enter some really dangerous territory and I don't think any of us realistically wants to go there.
 

trancefan2020

Member
Aug 23, 2024
26 Posts
4 Thanked
For some reason , Gabriel and Dresden didn't produce the dub version of ATRC . Not even Armin did it even though he always liked dub versions better. For all of its greatness, ATRC was too trancy for pop radio and culture and too poppy for trance and clubbing world. There were some good threads on Trance Addict at the time including the sample CD which Motorcycle used for ATRC.