It’s also the socialist thing to, and London came up because Conservatives generally argue that any hint of socialist policy is actually full blown socialism, and then leap to Venuzuela as the city’s inevitable future. I’m confused by this, because countries who operate within the same capitalist economic structure the US does, who have far more aggressive and expansive socialist/communist policies, are some of the biggest current and historical success stories on Earth. See China, Scandinavia, Bolivia, historical US, historical Britain… Jetflag you said it’s because they have tons of resources. Well so does the USA and so does NYC.
Mandami has a few dodgy policies for sure, but every politician does. His socialism and economic policies are lightweight compared to China, and they’ve thrived in unbelievable ways. So once again it is an exaggeration that anything Mandami brings is this foregone catatrasophe. It might even be good? Maybe reducing the wealth pump, inequality and returning power to labour within a conservative economic capitalist framework is a great combination. Peter Turchin makes an amazing argument for some of that actually, highly recommend checking out some of this work, I think you’d love it (try End Times).
Mandami has a few dodgy policies for sure, but every politician does. His socialism and economic policies are lightweight compared to China, and they’ve thrived in unbelievable ways. So once again it is an exaggeration that anything Mandami brings is this foregone catatrasophe. It might even be good? Maybe reducing the wealth pump, inequality and returning power to labour within a conservative economic capitalist framework is a great combination. Peter Turchin makes an amazing argument for some of that actually, highly recommend checking out some of this work, I think you’d love it (try End Times).