This is available on Beatport, but incorrectly titled. I checked because looks like every mix of every Breeder tune is on there so seems odd this wasn’t. Enjoy.
Quality sucks indeed as they sell rips from vinyl.This is available on Beatport, but incorrectly titled. I checked because looks like every mix of every Breeder tune is on there so seems odd this wasn’t. Enjoy.
If the quality sucks and anyone wants a recording from my 12” copy, dm me.
Yes, that is a problem with many older releases on Beatport and Juno ...Quality sucks indeed as they sell rips from vinyl.
Interesting to read that, I'm a vinyl noob but if i get extreme with owning certain records i might have to start collecting and doing my own rips.In many cases back then the master was cut to vinyl from DAT, so that’s what we get. Unless you know someone who has the DAT, and a player and equipment to record it….
Be aware though that a certain amount of labels used to carve lossy mp3 on wax (Lost Language is one of them) so the true masters won't ever be found as playing records only upsamples the audio.Interesting to read that, I'm a vinyl noob but if i get extreme with owning certain records i might have to start collecting and doing my own rips.
What’s your source for this? This is definitely something that HTFR (store not a record label) did, I got some of these dodgy pressings so I had the tune before tracking down the original 12”, some are surprisingly good, others are dogshit.Be aware though that a certain amount of labels used to carve lossy mp3 on wax (Lost Language is one of them) so the true masters won't ever be found as playing records only upsamples the audio.
You'd be surprised, really. I can clearly see a clear cut on their late releases (2003-2005) : Little Wonder - Eclipse, Critical 7 - Lost, Quadraphonic I Can Feel Your Love are obvious examples when tested both digtal and ripped from 12'' with Audacity (to prove the source you were asking). Even Rich's legendary "Solarcoaster" original was butchered to death. Vinyl doesn't mean a better quality standard as the records we buy are made using the exact same albeit non loud masters...What’s your source for this? This is definitely something that HTFR (store not a record label) did, I got some of these dodgy pressings so I had the tune before tracking down the original 12”, some are surprisingly good, others are dogshit.
But…. I can’t see a label like Lost Language doing this. There is no reason to when, unlike HTFR, they would be licensing the tunes directly from the producers, who would be able to provide .WAV .FLAC. .AIFF etc or even DAT for some of their earliest releases from 98/99.
I don't see that you can prove provenance on the master of the 12''s in that way, because a recording from the 12" cannot tell you the parameters of the source master in terms of bit transparency, and then even that is dependant on how you record it. We do not know how the audio wordlength has been altered on the master before it was pressed to vinyl e.g. if the master was a wav that was then compressed to a 320 kbps MP3, which was then used to press the vinyl, unless the routing used was completely bit transparent (it should be.... but..... y'know......) ... but even then bit transparency information wouldn't make it onto the vinyl.You'd be surprised, really. I can clearly see a clear cut on their late releases (2003-2005) : Little Wonder - Eclipse, Critical 7 - Lost, Quadraphonic I Can Feel Your Love are obvious examples when tested both digtal and ripped from 12'' with Audacity (to prove the source you were asking). Even Rich's legendary "Solarcoaster" original was butchered to death. Vinyl doesn't mean a better quality standard as the records we buy are made using the exact same albeit non loud masters...