I completely agree that when looking from the perspective of the entire industry it is probably a net negative. But it is a rare case when within my personal experience AI has given something positive. I don’t have access to classic compilation and this function means that my collection of favourite tracks coalesce around something resembling a single listening experience![]()
How is this about instant gratification?
This isn’t a very rational argument that completely misunderstands what is instant gratification. We have to differentiate between using a technology/tool/etc as a utility or to chase a quick dopamine hit.Learn to mix instead? Its not that hard - and gives much more satisfaction...software programs like Mixmeister.
I will rephrase, it is good compared to the effort required. Of course it is nothing compared to a talented djIt works amazingly bad. How can you say it works good?
It's beatmatched, but that's all it does. The transitions are aweful. It fades in a vocal (so it's mid-sentence) on top of melodies that fade out. It sucks.
For home parties... yeah it could be OK. The only plus side of this system is.... the system plays tracks for 1-2 minutes, not whole tracks. So that's a good quality for a home party. The 'deejaying', if a DJ did this at a wedding, I would point and laugh at him and tell him to go home. It sucks.
Edit: I have heard like 5 transitions now... and the beatmatching is also quite poor. So the grid-detection they use... doesn't do it's job well.
To be honest: Spotify has a little fade in / fade out function, where you can "mix" tracks a few seconds. I find that function working a lot better if you put that on like 2 seconds (for radio edit tracks).
The transitions are not too good for me. Dont know if its my settings.
Agree with this statement, ai is fine as a tool.This isn’t a very rational argument that completely misunderstands what is instant gratification. We have to differentiate between using a technology/tool/etc as a utility or to chase a quick dopamine hit.
It’s like saying that if you grill meat, but you didn’t go hunting or if you take a cab instead of driving then it is instant gratification.
Not every person has to learn every skill. I have other pursuits that give me more satisfaction and I chose not to learn mixing. So using automix is a utility and has nothing to do with instant gratification.
Agree with this statement, ai is fine as a tool.
and there is absolutely no need to apologise for it towards people trying to guilt trip you for using it over their respective hobby being under threat.
..And no amount of spiteful sabot sticking or complaining is going to alter that Adam. Your best bet is to encourage tool-based behaviour v full-front-end use..and ofcourse supporting “human” artists.Nah,it just breeds more of this instant,press one button and youre done generation - its all going down the pan imo. The mixes section will be full of Spotify AI mixes soon...
..And no amount of spiteful sabot sticking or complaining is going to alter that Adam. Your best bet is to encourage tool-based behaviour v full-front-end use..and ofcourse supporting “human” artists.
but Ai is here to stay, like it or not![]()
same here, and I actually count myself as one of your followers m8Oh,i know its staying,and all going downhill year by year now - il just keep on what ive been doing,im just glad i have a true, genuine following that ive built up over the years. Its just painful to see what the industry is becoming..