Why do producers call their releases "EP" when they're obviously not EPs?

Freezer

Elite Member
Sep 13, 2020
2,693 Posts
1,438 Thanked
This happens almost exclusively in electronic dance music, particularly techno and trance. Very often, producers refer to a standard release as an EP, but it’s actually a standard release with an A-side and a B-side or it could be considered a double A-side.

Historically, an EP represents something of an step between a maxi single and an album. The number of tracks are usually between 4 to 6 or even 8, and the total length is typically between 20 and 40 minutes.

Why does this keep happening, and what are the reasons behind it, when it’s clearly a bullshit?? :)
 

tranceissomewhatalive

Senior Member
Jul 25, 2025
576 Posts
469 Thanked
This happens almost exclusively in electronic dance music, particularly techno and trance. Very often, producers refer to a standard release as an EP, but it’s actually a standard release with an A-side and a B-side or it could be considered a double A-side.

Historically, an EP represents something of an step between a maxi single and an album. The number of tracks are usually between 4 to 6 or even 8, and the total length is typically between 20 and 40 minutes.

Why does this keep happening, and what are the reasons behind it, when it’s clearly a bullshit?? :)
Releases with two different tracks have been called EP on trance scene for ages, way before the "extended mix" fever for instance. You can find some examples from way back 2005 or so.

After all, for the digital release it makes no difference, which "a/b side" would you refer to for a WAV file, a side of what? :)