Hello guest! It looks like you're not a member yet. Register for free and get full access!
Everyday i see an increasing number of ads on TV/radio showing starving Africans or Asians as nothing but victims of their behavior.
These humanitarian organizations like Unicef are the true enemies of the poor, disempowering them and feeding them the pleasure-drug of believing that someone else is to blame and that the individual is not responsible for their conditions and their happiness. This opiate keeps them poor, but it buys votes and popularity for the people peddling it. Is it our responsibly to help poor people give birth to way more children then they can ever support?
Im sure many of you will mention the fact that we can fill the entire world population in Texas or whatever, but what kind of life would that be really?
Is there enough place for everyone? Yes. Is there enough food? Yes (but the climate change will make it difficult). Are there enough resources for everyone to have a good quality of life? No, we are 7 billion people on earth but we are all striving for a standard only 2 billion of us has, this is what makes the world highly overpopulated.
China realized this problem several decades ago and today their standards and economy is rising more then any other country in the world. Is this is a coincidence? Nope. Would this happen if they added 400-500 million more people? Nope. Would a global one child policy make the world a better place? Yes, why wouldn't it?
From an environmental point of view its the best thing that could ever happen, as well as for the animals (who are the real victims).
Is it more humane to let poor people give birth to an unlimited amount of children under horrible circumstances then forcing them not to?