SaltAcidFatHeatAcid
Senior Member
- Jul 19, 2022
- 656 Posts
- 888 Thanked
Your .
As for merits in your argument:
Do I agree fundamentally with all the back doors and baseball bat practices he and Trump are taking? Nbut I will pick Result over Procedure 8 out of 10 times in this case and will, in terms of Ethics, definitely rank that below actively funding groups incentivising Terror, Arson and Vandalism against ordinary people (or companies) who have done nothing wrong. Which is not something you cannot say about, at the very least half of the audited USAiD practices for example.
Ends justify the means eh? I feel like I’ve heard this argument before and it rarely ends well. Why am I arguing with a right wing European anyway about domestic US politics? I need to get out of here again lol. You have no skin in my US democracy game mate.
And what you call an audit is a largely illegal slash and burn operation of agencies the oversight (DOGE) has no real understanding of. There’s a right way to do what they want to do - and we know the votes imply they have a mandate to do so - but this ain’t it. And it’s not really going after the type of $$$ they are trying to save. And it’s going to get dragged down in court by doing it the wrong way anyway. While destroying a lot of what is valuable in civil service.
As for the rest of your argument on Tesla vandalism vs. Trump and Co attempting to break the bedrock norms of my democracy, I find it laughable, no offense. Our democracy is on fire right now and the Admin intends to break it further.
Oh hey and remember the project 2025 which you claim Trump didn’t want to see implemented? If EOs are successful, 40% of its goals are already implemented!