Bobby Summa
Elite Member
HeyYour birthday? Oh FFS you did tell me and I forgot...
HAPPY BIRTHDAY buddy![]()
No worries dude. Cheers
HeyYour birthday? Oh FFS you did tell me and I forgot...
HAPPY BIRTHDAY buddy![]()
She got me too for fathersday, just not quite like thatAh
It’s actually my birthday mate.. she got it for me![]()
Happy Birthday manHey
No worries dude. Cheers![]()
Ouch!She got me too for fathersday, just not quite like that
anyways, congrats bud
Thankfully though it’s got loads of great old styles/genres and foundations of electronica
…mostly there’s some interesting nostalgic lesser known styles one used to talk about around the kitchen table in the 90s
@TheTranceHistorian may be of interest. Although I Can’t confirm accuracy
I was there again this year. Had a great time despite having to miss the last day (and the ProdigyGlastonbury.....i dont get it.
That’s interesting. Personally I’m quite awful at depicting genres. When I go infront of my studio desk and open my daw to start a new track, I’ve no idea usually what genre il make, ( perhaps trance as a main genre if it’s a trancey vibe day but not what sub genre.I’ve been familiar with Ishkur’s Guide to Electronic Music for a few years now. As Ish himself puts it, there’s probably no one who understands the entire world of electronic music better than he does — though there are certainly people who specialize more deeply in individual branches, such as electro, Italodance, trance, techno, and so on. Because of this, it’s a great resource for my upcoming book (I even reference it at one point), but at the same time, it should be approached with some caution. One must be aware that there are significant contradictions and inaccuracies in his work when it comes to trance.
For example, he claims that nothing released after 1994 qualifies as proper trance anymore. But that cutoff feels completely arbitrary, especially if what he appreciates is the early hybrid sound infused with acid, techno, and ambient influences. That aesthetic undeniably continued into 1995 in a wide range of trance releases.
It’s also puzzling that he sometimes labels tracks as trance that completely lack the genre’s melodic, euphoric, hypnotic, or atmospheric qualities — and instead fully embrace the cold, mechanical, or even chaotic traits of techno. All this while he enthusiastically references the 1993 Berliner Trance documentary, where Mark Reeder quite clearly outlines what trance is — and the track excerpts featured there strongly contradict some of Ishkur’s own examples.
Then there’s the fact that he places the emergence of tech trance around 1998, even though the genre had already surfaced in 1994 with Solitaire – Chasing Clouds (Free Gliding Mix). Or how he repeatedly emphasizes that The KLF’s early works — such as the instrumental remix of What Time Is Love — are not trance, but proto-trance (which I can fully agree with, by the way). But then he makes the mistake of labeling other, strikingly similar tracks from 1989 and 1990 as trance, even though actual trance music didn’t emerge until 1991.
Sadly they didn't broadcast it overhere but saw some of the reports and interviews at the festival.I was there again this year. Had a great time despite having to miss the last day (and the Prodigy) as I couldn’t get the Monday off work.
Got to see Alanis Morissette live which was amazing and paid the yearly Glasto pilgrimage to Fatboy Slim as well:
![]()
If you think paying £6.50-7.00 for a pint is expensive, god help you if you ever go to London for a drink!Sadly they didn't broadcast it overhere but saw some of the reports and interviews at the festival.
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.youtube.com
in the 90s i invented (just amongst a small group of friends ) a term called EDM (Electronic Dance Music), to prevent genre confusion because it’s the most accurate name for electronic music with beats and you can dance to it if you do so choose. But this included Orbital / Banco de Gaia / Aphex Twin or any beat based electronica whether it sounded similar or completely different. . Just seemed a nicer more accurate term to IDM and covered much more styles / genres . Unfortunately when in the 2010s the term EDM came out globally I felt pretty miffed due to it being completely different music. A completely misleading acronym / title.
I was there again this year. Had a great time despite having to miss the last day (and the Prodigy) as I couldn’t get the Monday off work.
Got to see Alanis Morissette live which was amazing and paid the yearly Glasto pilgrimage to Fatboy Slim as well:
![]()
I’m hear that a lot, but it seems to be people who’ve never been saying stuff like that.The prodigy wouldve been only act id like to see haha! Watching on tv,it just looked mainly like middle class families with kids...surely they dont want to watch rappers etc.
Same here in AmsterdamIf you think paying £6.50-7.00 for a pint is expensive, god help you if you ever go to London for a drink!![]()
And that’s why I avoid big “popular” metropolitan areas like the plagueSame here in Amsterdam![]()
Aren't "Westland" and Rotterdam also kinda like a popular metropolitan area?And that’s why I avoid big “popular” metropolitan areas like the plague![]()
'House' music was (and still is) a genre that takes influences from 'Jazz', 'Funk', 'Disco' or 'Soul', the originators of the style were black people in the 'US', mainly 'Chicago' and 'Detroit'.The case with "progressive" is quite similar. It was never truly intended as a distinct style—and arguably never was one—but rather as an all-encompassing artistic philosophy that underpinned much of the soulful and innovative electronic music of the early '90s. That's precisely why I've always found genre labels like "progressive trance" somewhat perplexing. After all, progression, evolution, and a sense of journey are already foundational elements of trance music. So what makes "progressive trance" any different? That it evolves even more? It starts to feel like a redundant classification, if you ask me. Yet platforms like Discogs recognize it as a legitimate subgenre of trance, while curiously omitting other potentially more distinct ones — like ambient trance or acid trance, for example. By the way, this whole topic of "progressive" is explored quite thoroughly in a recently released Paul van Dyk interview.
'House' music was (and still is) a genre that takes influences from 'Jazz', 'Funk', 'Disco' or 'Soul', the originators of the style were black people in the 'US', mainly 'Chicago' and 'Detroit'.
When guys in the 'UK' and 'Italy' started their first experiments with 'House' music in the very early 90's their final producct sounded alot different than the jazzy 'US' stuff. to not mix up these two music styles, the 'Progressive' tag was made by the record stores. tracks with esoteric trippy atmosphere were automatically tagged as 'Progressive Trance' just to separate stuff for vinyl diggers
check early 'Limbo Records' or 'Hard Hands' labels to understand
it was never about any journey or progression in tracks
yeah they are, which is why I don't live thereAren't "Westland" and Rotterdam also kinda like a popular metropolitan area?
But you don't avoid those placesyeah they are, which is why I don't live there![]()