So how many pretend trance producers will come out of the woodwork now using this AI haha?!
I have to say it created a track which sounded better than Armin Destination track. But a part of me also wants to know how to make tracks like this in real life as well.So how many pretend trance producers will come out of the woodwork now using this AI haha?!
Didn't just Tupac family took down a song with AI version of him from Drake. So much for not reaching big labels.so far what I've heard from AI generated music were of a pretty low technical quality, I mean it's very far from major label hits in terms of mixdowns, mastering (if there's any in the AI stuff), etc. The samples used are often noticeably cheap and don't fit the composition.
Another point already discussed here is that it's all utterly unoriginal which is natural for a rehash, which is basically what any AI generator does to generate its output.
So yeah it's still far from affecting real money makers in the music industry.
isn't it how it slowly goes towards monopolizing in any business?This is a huge blow for smaller and indie artists where another form of revenues is slowly going away. Its bad enough what streaming services like Spotify are doing to them.
I mean I believe in shortcuts for the past year I used a ton of samples way more than when I started. But AI seems a bit cheat-y. I would be ok with using AI for sampling or even making samples. I do love playing with synths and twisting knobs (even if they are virtual ones). Still seems it will impact more purist producers I think.isn't it how it slowly goes towards monopolizing in any business?
the gap between the artists making it from their music (mostly from touring but music still plays its role there) and the others is already too big, same for the labels, only Armada, Black Hole and Anjuna remain kinda 'big' on trance scene and, you like the tunes or not, most of the time (except for shit that's not about music at all like that recent Oakey & Cox collab) their releases do sound on another level compared to what's coming on mid/low range labels. Artists need expensive equipment to make stuff sound really good, and with the tiny revenue from the smaller labels releases they sure won't be spending their day job savings on that for too long, especially over time when one gets family to take care of. so the AI would offer these guys making a technically average stuff, guess, with the AI development, more or less of the same level they'd come up themselves but just with a quick prompt instead of hours of starring in their DAWs. Believe me a lot of them still believe in short cuts and want everything right now, so they'll use AI and generate dozens of tracks and will spam them to dozens of labels.
Essentially it will lead to label demo emails becoming obsolete and each label will tend only to keep working with the artist that already proven himself for the label with previous releases. That's already happening though for different reasons.
this is significantly above the average and isn't cringe, that's true. however It still bugs me calling an AI service user an artist, sorry. only in a metaphorical sense like we're all artists and all we do is art@nightslapper here is the AI visual artist I mentioned before. I find his short animations absoloutely beautiful. It shows that not all AI output art the current level has to feel soulless/generic... although judging by some comments so people still think so. To me this is lovely.
![]()
ShaneF Motion Design on Instagram: "Autopoiesis - 2023 was a year of letting go. Thank you everyone for your support along this beautiful journey! On to the next one #digitalart #stablediffusion #aicommunity #midjourney #surrealart #howiseedatworld
214K likes, 617 comments - shanef3d on January 1, 2024: "Autopoiesis - 2023 was a year of letting go. Thank you everyone for your support along this beautiful journey! On to the next one #digitalart #stablediffusion #aicommunity #midjourney #surrealart #howiseedatworld #koi #fish".www.instagram.com
I've spent the afternoon playing with udio.com and eventually came up with the bellow two results. The hardest part at the moment is to generate something that is coherent from start to finish, but I'm fairly pleased with the results so far.
however It still bugs me calling an AI service user an artist
He didn't say it can't be named "art". He said the human typing in a prompt and downloading the product, should not be called "artist". And I agree.form of art
precisely what I told my cousin in lawdifferent people call different things different names, hard pill to swallow huh