UFOs and Aliens

[Jetflag]

What evidence would you personally hope to see?

The actual classified data

And not the ad nauseum “testimonies” or vague grainy black&white pics that so far has been overwhelmingly rejected as plausible extraterrestrial by the scientific community at large as either to vague or explained away as mundane.

what will at the very minimum be acceptable for me are razorsharp detailed 4K recordings from multiple independent simultaneous sources (planes, satellites, ground cams etc) combined with verifiable LiDAR and radar data that isn’t “well this could be a thunderstorm” levels vague, peer reviewed by multiple, preferably international scientific institutions/ scientists who all, generally, draw the same independent conclusions that this cannot be anything else then Alien life.

so while it is true that any sole piece of footage/data can be faked, expert can be mistaken or institution be scheming.. it is the combined Body of Evidence on a single or multiple event (and the quality thereof including credible expert interpretation/validation).. that will be the deciding factor in determining if this is actually true…or something UFO fanatics

dare I say it..

“want to believe”

and who will occasionally bemoan that the bar for their belief is set higher then say..what the weatherman predicts

But extraterrestri..sorry extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

 

[Hensmon]

They have the multiple data sources you describe. White House National Security Advisor talks about this directly in this interview

"we have radar imagery, thermals, different types of infrared sensors, you can't deny this stuff. This is real hard data showing objects doing things that cannot be explained"

 

[Jetflag]

They have the multiple data sources you describe. White House National Security Advisor talks about this directly in this interview

"we have radar imagery, thermals, different types of infrared sensors, you can't deny this stuff. This is real hard data showing objects doing things that cannot be explained"

2 things;

1: are they all from the same event?

2: if they have it:

FUCKING SHOW IT ALREADY THEN.

how many time do we need to keep hearing "yes we really really really really have this bulief us!" and then either nothing or " well no sorry, thats classified ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "

out with that shit, and per fedex linea recta to every credible scientific institutions/ scientist on the planet while they're at it

 

[Hensmon]

Today the UAPDF and House Committee on Oversight and Accountability is hosting a congressional hearing titled “Understanding UAP: Science, National Security & Innovation.”

Participants:
Tim Gallidut - Navy Rear Admiral
Dr. Avi Leob - Head of Astrophysics Harvard
Dr. Eric Davis - PHD Astrophysics
Mike Gold - NASA (on their study UAP study team)
Kirk McConnell - Senate Intelligence and Armed Services Committees
Chris Mellon - Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
Dr. Anna Brady-Estevez - PHD Chemical Engineering
Luis Elizondo - Former Director of Pentagons Arial Threat Identification Program

Just posting this as reminder that the some of the worlds brightest minds in physics, as well the US's highest members of intelligence, all believe UAP represent a non-human intelligence and actively work towards bringing the discussion to the public sphere.

Part of the reason I have such conviction on what UAP are is because I trust these people and the many others like them. No reason has been shown why we should think them liars. But most importantly, the counter-argument thats been offered, that they are all involved in a multi-year conspiracy goaled on convincing the world of a false alien visitation, is just (imo) completely ridiculous, irrational and also has no supporting evidence. That's not compelling at all.

 

[Jetflag]

..then surely they can present us with credible evidence that the rest of the scientific world can confirm no?

 

[Bobby Summa]

Today the UAPDF and House Committee on Oversight and Accountability is hosting a congressional hearing titled “Understanding UAP: Science, National Security & Innovation.”

Participants:
Tim Gallidut - Navy Rear Admiral
Dr. Avi Leob - Head of Astrophysics Harvard
Dr. Eric Davis - PHD Astrophysics
Mike Gold - NASA (on their study UAP study team)
Kirk McConnell - Senate Intelligence and Armed Services Committees
Chris Mellon - Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
Dr. Anna Brady-Estevez - PHD Chemical Engineering
Luis Elizondo - Former Director of Pentagons Arial Threat Identification Program

Just posting this as reminder that the some of the worlds brightest minds in physics, as well the US's highest members of intelligence, all believe UAP represent a non-human intelligence and actively work towards bringing the discussion to the public sphere.

Part of the reason I have such conviction on what UAP are is because I trust these people and the many others like them. No reason has been shown why we should think them liars. But most importantly, the counter-argument thats been offered, that they are all involved in a multi-year conspiracy goaled on convincing the world of a false alien visitation, is just (imo) completely ridiculous, irrational and also has no supporting evidence. That's not compelling at all.

I really hope they are right dude. My friend has a large telescope and has been videoing at night what it sees. Not as detailed as some UAP videos but dancing moving balls of light in the sky that look rather amazing. Will try and list soon, tried once but video format wasn’t compatible.

This world sure needs an injection of some kind to give a sense of educational wonder about the physics of different dimensional possibilities, so I do ‘hope’ one day scientists find and reveal relatively indisputable evidence of things we often cannot yet fathom.