I would be careful with that because all of those talking points are deeply rooted in the m-word, and even liberal guys who vote dem fall easily for them. Most guys fall for them, actually, regardless of political beliefs.I agree that Tate makes things worse. but disagree that (radical) feminism isn't failing young men.
If you have an dominant paradigm/overall narrative that (so to speak) basically tells you you're a worthless rapist, every women is holy and unquestionable and you should just make way and shut up all the time.. how do you think that in the long run affects men? How do you think that affects their self-worth?
And i'm not talking you and me, I'm talking especially the vunerable, impressionalbe one's who're already not very far up the dominance hierarchy ladder? proto-candidate incels if you want.
Now again, aside from the discussions here and elsewhere which I find interresting I don't really care about incels, I think its a bit of natural selection etc. But I don't see how the idea that feminism isn't what has caused this or at the very least heavily contributed is in any way viable.
Andrew rate is basically the monster (radical) feminism created.
From a woman's perspective (esp a radical feminist, if you will), are you really saying that some men out there are fragile enough that they will follow Andrew Tate because a feminist said not nice things to them?