An ad veracundeam fallacy
correct...The fallacy is belief in evidence from someone who is an authority, but not in the right field of context.
wrong..In the discussion of UFOs, the head of intelligence would precisely be the authority suited for the topic, followed by astronauts and pilots.
Something for you @Hensmon
you're mixing a lot of stuff up here m8..
who mostly consists of bureaucrats, management, politicians and people concerned with funding and who are also the ones releasing and auditing the UAP nothing-burger reports we've been seeing so far, and coïncidently the ones we're refering to/the subject on what an ad veracundeam fallacy is or isn'tWho do you think makes up the intelligence conmunity Jetflag. It’s scientists, data analysts, engineers, aeronautics, aviators, counter intelligence operatives, and more. It’s every speciality imaginable reporting up the chain of command to the D.N.I.
Yeah I don't think micho Kaku or Avi Leob for that matter has no issue with temporal paradoxes associated with FTL m8 they're a huge problem for anyone wanting to ftl and understanding the subject matter....its like a division by 0...Again, I think you're mixing up stuff/ reading what you want to read.Sorry i'm not saying and sharing Avi Leob's and Michio Kaku thoughts because I think they are proof that UAP are alien, just showing clearly that at least two brilliant physicists believe it's possible for that to be the case. They have no issue with it. So the arm-chair comments that the universe is 'too big' or physics 'too understood' is not something the experts agree with you on. They are open, and possibly in belief, that the UAPs might be alien.
What evidence?He takes his evidence
Why on earth don’t they just show/ release the actual evidence if they actually had anything credible?Why on earth is congress demanding the necessity for this legislation if they don't know this to be true?
STOP ASKING SENSIBLE QUESTIONSWhat evidence?
Why on earth don’t they just show/ release the actual evidence if they actually had anything credible?
He did say that the bodies and craft retrieval stuff was what he’d heard from other ‘trusted’ people and hadn’t seen any of them directly himself.June was incredible month for disclosure. We get Dave Grusch, one of the highest ranking intelligence officials in the US, who after investigating UAP for 2 years goes on national TV and states not only that visitation is real , but that the US has a 70 years crash retrieval program and recovered craft and bodies. Multiple high ranking peers come out and back him and his claims.
He takes his evidence to the Inspector General, who validates it to be "credible and urgent". As a results it's passed onto the Senate Intelligence Committee and Congress, where he testifies under oath for 11 hours (alongside 8 other separate testifying witnesses). 3 weeks pass and multiple congressional reps come out and back up the claims. Not a single person yet to dispute his claims.
As a result of the evidence, a new Senate intelligence bill has been written that specifically demands private aerospace companies who hold ALIEN CRAFT hand it over to the Pentagons UAP office within 6 months!!! From the amendment directly: “a comprehensive list of all non-earth origin or exotic unidentified anomalous phenomena material" possessed and to make it available to the AARO director for "assessment, analysis, and inspection."
Why on earth is congress demanding the necessity for this legislation if they don't know this to be true?
I’m actually with the sceptical side of @bobby shuma on this and believe these type of legislative measures to be nothing more then a (future) tool to legitimise and ultimately white-wash (more) tax payer money into branch of government into things like “more research needed” that for 50 years hasn’t brought forth anything substantial.The fact of the matter is If Grusch's claims were false or came without strong evidence, the Inspector General would not have publicly called it credible and would not have passed it onto the Senate and House intelligence committees, who upon reviewing it this last 3 weeks have only continued to back it, going as far as writing actual legislation which demands aerospace companies to hand over alien craft. It's clearly not just grapevine hearsay he's provided otherwise none of the aforementioned would have happened.
In short, everyone at the highest level of government is convinced by what he has provided, and they are acting upon it in real time with legislation. No one is countering or criticizing him. A public hearing looks like it will be taking place at the end of the month, meaning he will testify under oath (again) for the public to see. Possibly alongside the other 8/9 witnesses.
We all want to see the evidence, which according to Grush is the names of the programs and people involved, testimonies and 1000s of pages of documentation, including pictures, videos and analysis from craft and bodies. These are from highly classified military operations and Special Access Programs that even certain members of congress do not even have clearance to hear in private settings. The US Gov can never just gonna upload everything open source for us to read on reddit, and that's just the reality of it.
Asking the question again @jetflag ...If this is all bullshit, what is the need for congress to write this legislation?