I am, because the objects are seen by three different aircraft, the F18 and 2 commercial airlines. They also took videos of them. It is not plausible it's a hallucination.
I was referring to the majority
of sights out there. Mass psychosis (like in another instance Milagre do Sol)
is still more
likely/plausible, then physics breaking down. As for the videos: they are (as always) incredibly vague, even with our new modern equipment.
The language in the video is also quite loaded, and leading the subject rather then actually questioning it.
you could make a simillar video about this:
..and claim the mothership was going to land before "mysteriously" vanishing and "breaking all physics"
Equally, If you gave this particular hit piece any other context, we’d be talking about an odd athmospheric reflection of say: planets, instead of UFO sightings.
I for one am not impressed, this is equally "valid" evidence as that ridiculous parallax shot of that duck flying near ground level.
we have a mixture of radar
..which didn't occur in this event. lets not mix things up there. There was no mention of any radar plots in this particular piece, and if i'm wrong on that:, link please? So far we have 1 ad veracundeum testimony. Sorry, not enough.
video,extended time frames, fixed positions and multiple witnesses, all of which the sceptic must ignore in order to make fit the ridiculous, evidence-less, mass pilot hallucination theory into an explanation for all this that doesn't even pass for sensical or logical even with that made as the assumption.
And yet, its still more plausible
then the violation of well established physics/ reality breaking down (thinks like causality breaking +c's etc. ) that the UFO Tfoofers seem to take as Gospel as the One True Explanation for this.
These objects are absolutely real, and they are flying above the ceiling of almost all known aircraft, possible high enough beyond all known aircraft is his estimates are correct and regardless the maneuvers are impossible for all known aircraft. Impossible is the right term, based on all our known physics.
m8, you can't even be sure if they're objects
, as in physical things to begin with. But yes, you are right that impossible is the right term, based on all our known physics.