I saw this today in my twitter feed. It is a quote from a US congressman after leaving a classified environment to review UAP evidence. It helped me realize how I feel on this topic so I’m going to vocalize.
Something highly unusual is clearly and obviously operating in the skies. Every single person and institution brought in so far on the matter concludes this. Frankly it has to be total denial to believe nothing is happening here. Commenters who are insisting UAP are absolutely nothing or "normal" are no different than those insisting they are spectacularly abnormal (alien). I only commented in defense of Leob before because the 'criticism' of him was so asinine that it comes across as byproduct of said denial.
I don’t care what Dr Leob believes. Extraterrestrial is still and by far the LEAST LIKELY reason for the vehicles, and that's how I feel. However to flippantly ignore the evidently growing number of credible and respectable voices, ones that are in best position to know what’s what, who claim otherwise, is pure bias or denial in the face of facts. If you want to be immature an lump this endless number of institutions and individuals together into some grand and completely non-sensical alien hoax conspiracy - to which there is not a shred of evidence for - in order to reconcile this then by all means keep the fingers in the ear and head in the sand while rest of the adults thankfully continue to take this topic seriously.
Personally my belief is that what we are witnessing is the uncovering of a military or aerospace company who have made a significant scientific breakthrough, one that has allowed them to construct technology that goes far beyond what we in the public sphere consider to be remotely achievable. God help us if it actually turns out to be China flying these.
This is what the pilots are seeing and discussing in congress, and these are the programs that Grusch is providing evidence from. For whatever reason, his interpretation is alien. Maybe because the tech is so abnormal he mistakes it as such, or maybe because he is being fed a line in order to obfuscate and confuse away from the reality. But one of those must be taking place and clearly with enough credibility and conviction behind it to convince the entire US gov to go as far as to write laws about “non human” vehicle transparency. If there’s even the remotest 1% chance his assessment is actually correct, the every ounce of seriousness and attention should be focused on confirming it, because the implications are beyond imagining. We need answers, not denial. It would completely change the world.
